Thursday, October 29, 2020

BANKRUPTCY MISTAKES - BANKRUPTCY LAWYER IN BERGEN COUNTY NJ (201) 646-333

  BANKRUPTCY MISTAKES


Do not make these mistakes.  They can cause your case to be delayed and even cause the judge to deny your discharge.


1. Don’t Pay Back Loans To Relatives Or Business Associates Before Filing Bankruptcy.


People who are thinking of filing for bankruptcy often feel the desire to pay back loans to friends and family before filing the petition. This is understandable, but it is a big mistake. Under bankruptcy law all creditors who are in the same position must be treated equally. Bankruptcy law views your debt to Uncle Bob as just like your debt to Capital One Visa. You can’t pay Uncle Bob first. If certain creditors are paid ahead of others this is called a “preference.” If a preference occurs the bankruptcy trustee can get a court order forcing Uncle Bob to return the money. This is not good for family harmony.
Even worse than a “preference” is a “fraudulent transfer.” If the court finds that money was paid to a relative in a deliberate attempt to hide assets, this can be found to be a fraudulent transfer. This can result in the complete denial of your discharge, and possibly even criminal charges. This is a very serious matter. If you try and hide things from the court you could end up going to jail.

2. Don’t Transfer Property Out Of Your Name.


Do not transfer ownership of valuable items to family members or others just before filing bankruptcy. If this is discovered the bankruptcy trustee will seek to reclaim this property and sell it for the benefit of creditors. Such transfers of title are frequently unnecessary anyway, because bankruptcy law often provides protection for your home, car, and other valuable items. As with everything in bankruptcy, the key is to be fully honest, disclose everything, and put your cards on the table.

3. Don’t Drain Your 401k To Try And “Catch Up” On Your Debts.


Most retirement funds are protected in bankruptcy.  You will ordinarily be able to wipe out all your debts and still keep your retirement accounts. It is not a good strategy to withdraw money from those accounts and use it to try and catch up on bills that you can’t pay. Most of the time bankruptcy is still required anyway even after you spend the money from the 401k, and then you will have the same bankruptcy but your retirement account will be gone. Don’t make this common mistake.

4. Don’t Wait To File Bankruptcy Until After A Foreclosure Or Repossession.


People often struggle for years under an impossible debt load until they are forced to take action due to a foreclosure or repossession. But this is a wasteful and painful road to travel when your debts are too heavy to carry. If bankruptcy is going to be necessary, it is almost always better to file it sooner rather than later. There is no benefit to be had by spending thousands of dollars and suffering tremendous stress and anxiety chasing after debts that can never be paid. Under U.S. law you have a right to a second chance and fresh start through bankruptcy. Your family will thank you if you get the information you need as soon as possible. Don’t wait until you are faced with an emergency.

5. On The Other Hand, Don’t Rush Into Bankruptcy When It Is Better To Wait.


Although it is usually better to file bankruptcy at the earliest time, in some situations it can be just as important not to file too soon. For example, if you are pregnant or you can see that certain medical bills are likely to arise in the near future, then it is probably best to hold off on filing. It makes no sense to discharge your credit card debts in bankruptcy and then immediately face crushing and unaffordable long term medical bills.
Remember, you can only file chapter 7 once every eight years.
Another reason to wait before you file is if you are expecting an inheritance or large tax refund. Under bankruptcy law a tax refund is treated like cash and depending on your state exemptions you may not be able to keep it. If you are expecting to receive cash of this nature it might be better to hold off on filing until after you receive the money. You can then use this money to pay down non-dischargeable debts like student loans and child support arrears. That way when the bankruptcy process is complete you will be left with a lighter burden as you move forward.
The point here is that sometimes in bankruptcy, timing is everything. There is nothing improper about using the time factor to your advantage within the boundaries of what is legal under the Bankruptcy Code. People do this all the time in relation to tax matters and no one considers it to be improper. You should check with your bankruptcy attorney to get advice on timing under the particular circumstances of your case.

6. Don’t Use Credit Cards Or Take Cash Advances Right Before Filing.


Once you have seriously considered bankruptcy as an option you should immediately stop the use of all credit cardsBankruptcy law does not allow you to run up credit card charges that you know you will not be able to repay. Credit card use in the months before filing bankruptcy can result in a denial of discharge for some or all of your debts.  It can even result in criminal charges.

7. Don’t Disregard Pending Lawsuits.


Sometimes people assume that if they’re planning to file bankruptcy, they don’t have to respond to or appear in court for pending lawsuits. This is not true.  If lawsuits are allowed to continue before the bankruptcy is filed, this can result in liens against your property. After the petition is filed you will be protected by the “automatic stay,” but until that time be sure not to ignore legal actions take against you.

8. Don’t Keep A Large Amount Of Money In Your Bank Account On The Day You File For Bankruptcy.


If you have more than a minimal amount of money in your bank accounts on the day you file for bankruptcy, the trustee may take it and distribute it to creditors. You should time your bankruptcy filing so that the lowest amount possible is in your bank account the day (and hour) that you file. Keep in mind that you cannot simply withdraw the cash to reduce your account. Rather, you must empty your account, as much as possible, by using it up paying normal living expenses and non-dischargeable debts.
As a related matter, it is a good idea to move your bank account if you have your account with the same bank that issued your loans or credit cards. Once you file bankruptcy that bank has the right to “setoff.” This means that the bank can take the money in your account to cover your loans on the day you file. Therefore, if the bank is your creditor you should move your money to a different bank before filing.

9. Don’t Fail To Attend Your Hearing(s).


In most cases, you must attend just one bankruptcy hearing in a chapter 7, and two in a chapter 13. If you don’t attend these hearings, the court could dismiss your bankruptcy.  This would mean that you would lose any legal protection you had from the bankruptcy and you would go back to the same position you were in before filing.

10. Don’t Withhold Information From Your Lawyer.


No one likes to reveal the details of their finances, especially when dealing with a bankruptcy. But it is very important to understand that honesty and full disclosure are absolutely essential. The law is actually on your side in bankruptcy. If you follow the rules, bankruptcy is a powerful tool that can give you a second chance and a fresh start.  But in exchange for that fresh start, bankruptcy law requires that you put all your cards on the table. Your bankruptcy lawyer must be aware of all the facts in order to protect your interests.  Lack of information creates serious risks.
It is also important to remember that you will sign your petition under oath, expressly stating that you have fully disclosed all relevant facts. If you hide facts you can lose assets, have your bankruptcy case dismissed, and even face criminal charges. Your lawyer also may withdraw from your case if you are not completely honest.
Remember, withholding information from your lawyer is never the right choice.  You will never obtain a better result by hiding information, and you will risk the possibility of serious negative consequences.

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY IN NEW JERSEY - (201) 646-3333

 

REPOSSESSION


BANKRUPTCY LAWYER IN HACKENSACK 

NEW JERSEY (201) 646-3333


Anyone who has fallen behind on their car payments or other loans for personal possessions or work tools eventually faces the threat of repossession.  Miss too many payments and your truck or car may suddenly be seized by the dealership or bank from your home or where you work.  If you have so many debts that you simply cannot keep up with even the minimum payments or have begun to use one credit card to pay off another you need help. There are solutions to such serious financial problems. One solution to consider is bankruptcy.  To find out more and learn how bankruptcy could protect your car or other possessions from repossession you should speak to a northern New Jersey 

My name is Alex. I recommend Mr Rafael Gomez, he did a wonderful job, he came highly recommended and it proved to be true and if you're ever ever need a great attorney he's the right person for the job and he'll stay with you due to the end and hopefully things will work out. Thank you.

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

SHORT SALE / DEED IN LIEU - (201) 646-3333

 Short Sale/ Deed In Lieu


Many individuals in the northern New Jersey area are facing serious problems regarding the ownership of a home purchased during the sub-prime mortgage boom.  No one really understood how terrible the result of this type of mortgage could be.  Sadly, many families in the Bergen, Hudson and Passaic County area have already lost their homes as they did not take immediate action and contact a New Jersey Bankruptcy lawyer to assist them in resolving the issue.  Many debtors believe that participating in a short sale or signing over a deed in lieu of foreclosure will forever wipe out any mortgage debt. However, we have seen in many cases that lenders are coming after these debtors for the "deficiency" and many times are suing debtors to collect the deficiency.


A short sale is essentially the opportunity to sell your home for an amount that is less than the mortgaged amount. This can be a viable option for some individuals, but in other cases, it is too far past the point where a short sale can be achieved before foreclosure.  In these cases, it may be necessary to file a bankruptcy filing to halt the proceedings on the foreclosure in order to have time to resolve the issue and not end up out on the street.  Each case is unique, and it is critical that you get knowledgeable legal advice and are steered in the right direction, depending on your circumstances.

My name is Stephanie, me and my family have been using Mr Gomez as our attorney for a really long time now. And we 100% recommend that you call him right now.



What is a deed in lieu?

A deed in lieu is another option that is available to some individuals.  This is when the property is signed over to the bank and the individual no longer has to deal with the main mortgage securing the property. However, many debtors have mortgaged their property with two mortgages. It is typical for many northern New Jersey homeowners to have financed their homes with and 80/20 type of mortgage situation. This is where one mortgage secures 80% of the home and another mortgage secures the other 20% percent of the home.  These debtors usually purchased the home with no down payment and 100% financing.  Signing over a deed in lieu of foreclosure may in some cases resolve the problems with the larger mortgage; however, the smaller mortgage is still owed to the lender (usually a different lender).    These matters are emotional and extremely upsetting, and the northern New Jersey bankruptcy law firm of Rafael Gomez understands that you need help, and you need it now.  Your questions will be answered confidentially and you will understand your actual options, and can avoid scam artists that are preying on those who are suffering financial stress.


Contact Bergen, Hudson, Passaic County bankruptcy attorney Rafael Gomez by calling (201) 646-3333

Good morning. My name is Asunta Colombo. I'm from Salerno, Italy. And I went to Mr. Gomez to take my case and he won and I'm very very happy.


Monday, October 19, 2020

BERGEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY - (201) 646-3333

 

 BERGEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY BANKRUPTCY

Considering Filing for Bankruptcy?


With the economy in its current state, hearing that people are struggling with debt is, sadly, not as uncommon as one would like to hear. Too many people find themselves slipping further and further down the slippery slope, caught between the fast paced world that we live in and the simultaneous culture of plastic money and wanting more. Credit card companies are of no help either, as at the end of the day they are only concerned with making a profit, not helping you get your feet back underneath you to successfully move forward with your life.

If you are currently facing a situation similar to this, it is in your best interest to talk to an experienced  New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer about the possibility of filing for bankruptcy. By talking to someone knowledgeable about this process, you can have your questions answered; questions about bankruptcy warnings signsif you qualifywhat chapter is right for you, the bankruptcy benefitsexemptions, what you will lose and the types of debts that can be eliminatedBankruptcy can be a terrifying, confusing process to try and take on, but with the proper guidance, you have no reason to fear it. It can merely be a way for you to move forward into the next chapter in your life.

My name is Paulino I am a client of Rafael Gomez, he's really intelligent, stays on top of his duties. I strongly recommend him as your lawyer, come through.



Why Hire a Bankruptcy Lawyer?


At the law firm of Rafael Gomez, we understand the questions and concerns you will have if you are considering filing for bankruptcy. We know that it appears complex and the ideas of Chapter 7, and Chapter 13 may appear foreign and overwhelming. There, are, however many things that you can do to help yourself. By closely working with your case, and giving you the undivided personal attention that you deserve, you can breathe easier knowing that you are dealing with someone devoted to getting you to the optimum outcome. No matter if you are concerned with credit card debt or life after bankruptcy, we will be here to help you.


Hello friends, my name is Ingrid, I'm a client of Rafael Gomez he did a a little case to me and everything went fine and I will recommend to all of you.



If you are currently considering filing for bankruptcycontact Rafael Gomez by calling (201) 646-3333.

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

WARNING SIGNS OF BANKRUPTCY

 WARNING SIGNS OF BANKRUPTCY

(201) 646-3333

If several of the following apply in your situation, you might consider discussing bankruptcy with New Jersey Bankruptcy lawyer Rafael Gomez:




  • your total debt, not including your car or house loan, is more than you could pay, even over five or more years
Hi Rafael Gomez, I just coming to my house I got already my divorce that's why I wanted to send you this message I appreciate what you do and with for me and I want to recommend all my friends. Thank you.



  • collection agencies are calling you at home and/or at work




  • you owe income taxes that you are currently unable to pay

  • you have few assets




People who have had their wages garnished can especially benefit from a bankruptcy because the bankruptcy will stop the garnishment and could potentially help you get some of the garnished money back.


Hi guys my name is Vanessa Reynoso I hired mr. Gomez as one of my lawyer for me, to help me out and I could have been more happier with his help so I recommend you guys if you guys need any help to hire him, because he'll get you out of a bad situation.


Wednesday, October 7, 2020

CHAPTER 7 ARTICLE - BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY IN HACKENSACK NJ 07601 - (201) 646-3333

 

EVE C. PASTERNAK and STEVEN PASTERNAK, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PNC BANK, N.A., PNC BANK, Defendant-Respondent, and
MATTELMAN, WEINROTH & MILLER, PC; GEORGE J WEINROTH; JOHN C. MILLER, III; MARTIN WEINBERG, Defendants.

No. A-0507-13T1.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 10, 2016.
Decided March 4, 2016.

Steven Pasternak, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Eve C. Pasternak, appellant pro se, joined in pro se appellant's brief.

Roberto A. Rivera-Soto argued the cause for respondent (Ballard Spahr, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Rivera-Soto, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Ostrer and Haas.


Hi Rafael Gomez, I just coming to my house I got already my divorce that's why I wanted to send you this message I appreciate what you do and with for me and I want to recommend all my friends. Thank you.



NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Steven and Eve Pasternak appeal from the August 12, 2013 Law Division order granting defendant PNC Bank, N.A.'s (PNC) motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiff's complaint. We affirm.

We derive the following facts and procedural history from the motion record. Plaintiffs formerly held title to a residence in Livingston, New Jersey. The property was subject to two mortgages held by United Trust Bank (United). Plaintiffs defaulted on the mortgages and United commenced foreclosure proceedings. On June 15, 2005, the Chancery Division entered a final judgment of foreclosure of $222,366.58 against plaintiffs.

PNC later acquired the mortgages, but did not move to amend the judgment or seek post-judgment costs. Plaintiffs continued to live in the home. PNC paid the taxes and other carrying costs on the property. PNC sent monthly late payment notices to plaintiffs from the time it acquired the mortgages, but plaintiffs failed to pay the judgment. After PNC scheduled a sheriff's sale, plaintiff Steven Pasternak filed an unsuccessful Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. The sheriff's sale was thereafter postponed nine additional times.

On February 29, 2008, PNC gave plaintiffs an incorrect payoff figure of $284,194.81 to satisfy the judgment. The parties soon realized that this amount was higher than the actual payoff figure. In the course of seeking another postponement of the sheriff's sale, this time based on their receipt of the incorrect payoff figure, plaintiffs advised the Chancery Division that they had received a $495,000 refinancing commitment from a bank and wished to pay the judgment and retain the property. However, they told the court that they had left the signed documentation verifying this commitment at home. The court adjourned the proceeding so that plaintiffs could go home over the lunch break, retrieve the documentation, and bring it back to court. Plaintiffs left the courthouse and never returned. The court denied plaintiffs' postponement request and the sheriff's sale was held on March 11, 2008.

Plaintiffs then filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, listing PNC's secured claim at $286,000. On April 14, 2008, the bankruptcy court dismissed plaintiffs' claim with prejudice "as a bad faith filing."

Plaintiffs refused to vacate the property. A writ of possession was issued but, two days before the writ was to be executed, plaintiffs filed a complaint in federal district court, seeking to enjoin their eviction because PNC had earlier provided them with an incorrect payoff figure. On November 13, 2008, the district court denied plaintiffs' motion for a stay of eviction and, on February 19, 2009, the court dismissed plaintiffs' complaint.

On March 9, 2010, plaintiffs filed a six-count complaint against PNC and other defendants[1] in the Law Division. Alleging that PNC provided them with an incorrect payoff figure in an attempt to wrongfully take their residence, plaintiffs sought $1.5 million in damages against PNC for intentional misrepresentation or fraud (count one); violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -200 (count two); violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692 to -1692p (count three); breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing (count four); negligence (count five); and usury (count six).

PNC removed the case to the federal district court, which dismissed count three, and returned the matter to the Law Division. On April 23, 2012, Judge Carolyn E. Wright commenced a bench trial concerning plaintiffs' remaining claims. After three days of testimony, the parties agreed to submit summary judgment motions to the court for consideration. On August 12, 2013, Judge Wright granted PNC's motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice.

In a thorough fifteen-page written opinion, Judge Wright fully explained the reasons underlying her decision. After painstakingly reviewing the parties' arguments, the judge found that plaintiffs' claims concerning the incorrect payoff figure were barred by the common law litigation privilege, which bars claims premised on "`any communication (1) made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings; (2) by litigants or other participants authorized by law; (3) to achieve the objects of the litigation; and (4) that have some connection or logical relation to the action.'" Hawkins v. Harris, 141 N.J. 207, 216 (1995) (quoting Silberg v. Anderson, 50 Cal. 3d 205, 212 (1990)). The judge found that all four of these factors were met in this case and that "[e]xtensive case law demonstrates that identical claims based upon alleged improper payoff figures have regularly been dismissed."[2]


My name is Radj Diovado, Rafal Gomez represented me in my case and I’m very satisfied. I recommend him.



Judge Wright also found that plaintiffs' claims concerning the incorrect payoff figure were barred by res judicata. The judge noted that plaintiffs' argument that PNC deliberately falsified the payoff figure had been rejected by: (1) the Chancery Division when it permitted the sheriff's sale to proceed in March 2008; (2) the bankruptcy court when it dismissed plaintiffs' Chapter 7 petition in April 2008; and (3) the federal district court when it denied plaintiffs' motion to enjoin their eviction in November 2008. Thus, the judge found that "[t]he elements of res judicata were therefore met and [p]laintiffs' claims are barred."

Finally, the judge found that plaintiffs failed to "establish fraud against PNC because the discrepancy [in the payoff figure] was immaterial [and] there is no proof that they reasonably relied upon it." Plaintiffs represented to the Chancery Division that they had access to $495,000 to pay the judgment, which exceeded the payoff figure that PNC provided. Thus, plaintiffs could not demonstrate they sustained any damages as a result of PNC's mistake. This appeal followed.

On appeal, plaintiffs raise the following contentions:

POINT I
JUDGE WRIGHT'S RULING THAT PNC BANK MAY FABRICATE, DOUBLE-BILL, AND OVERSTATE THE AMOUNT DUE TO SETTLE A DEBT PRIOR TO A SHERIFF SALE IS CONTRARY TO RES JUDICATA, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL, LAW OF THE CASE, AND NEW JERSEY LAW.
The R[ule] 4:46-1 Summary Judgment Standard[.]
PNC Violated . . . Rule 4:42-11[.]
PNC Violated N.J.S.A. 31:1-3[.]
PNC Violated New Jersey's Fair Foreclosure Act[.]
New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 [to -200.]
Summary Judgment Is Appropriate On The Amount of Damages[.]
POINT II
JUDGE WRIGHT'S ERRONEOUS DECISION IS CONTRARY TO RES JUDICATA, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL, THE LAW OF THE CASE[,] AND NEW JERSEY LAW.
POINT III
JUDGE WRIGHT'S ERRONEOUS DECISION NOT ONLY LEGALIZES FRAUD, BUT COULD IMPOSE A FIDUCIARY DUTY UPON THE BANK AND ITS ATTORNEYS TO DEFRAUD THE COURTS AND NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS.

Our review of a ruling on summary judgment is de novo, applying the same legal standard as the trial court. Townsend v. Pierre, 221 N.J. 36, 59 (2015). "Summary judgment must be granted if `the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show . . . there is no genuine issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment . . . as a matter of law.'" Town of Kearny v. Brandt, 214 N.J. 76, 91 (2013) (quoting R. 4:46-2(c)).

Thus, we consider, as the trial judge did, whether "the competent evidential materials presented, when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, are sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of the non-moving party." Ibid. (quoting Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 142 N.J. 520, 540 (1995)). If there is no genuine issue of material fact, we must then "decide whether the trial court correctly interpreted the law." Massachi v. AHL Servs., Inc., 396 N.J. Super. 486, 494 (App. Div. 2007), certif. denied, 195 N.J. 419 (2008). We accord no deference to the trial judge's conclusions on issues of law and review issues of law de novo. Nicholas v. Mynster, 213 N.J. 463, 478 (2013).

We have considered plaintiffs' contentions in light of the record and applicable legal principles and conclude that they are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We are satisfied that Judge Wright properly granted summary judgment to PNC, and affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in her thoughtful and comprehensive August 12, 2013 written opinion.


My name is Paula Hidalgo I found Rafael Gomez online and he was my attorney and he got me out of some trouble with licenses and I would to recommend him to anyone.



Affirmed.

[1] Plaintiffs' claims against the other defendants were subsequently dismissed and these defendants are not parties to this appeal.

[2] See, e.g., Rickenbach v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 635 F. Supp. 2d 389, 400-01 (D.N.J. 2009) (barring claims based on incorrect payoff statements due to litigation privilege); Giles v. Phelan, Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP, 901 F. Supp. 2d 509, 524-26 (D.N.J. 2012) (litigation privilege barred Consumer Fraud Act claim in the context of payoff statements).

Monday, October 5, 2020

EXEMPTIONS - HACKENSACK BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY(201) 646-3333

 

EXEMPTIONS HACKENSACK 

BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY

(201) 646-3333



Some property is protected, or exempt from your creditors' claims, and you get to keep it. When determining what is considered exempt, many states allow you to choose and use the state's definition of exempt or the list set out by federal law. Some states require you to use the state's list. Be sure to check your state's laws to find out what applies to your state

Exempt property can include these property types:


The 2005 reform laws also limit your options to move to another state to take advantage of more generous exemptions.

Most Chapter 7 cases are "no-assetcases, which means that you don't have nonexempt property for the trustee to sell and use to pay creditors. Your bankruptcy petition states whether your case is "asset" or "no-asset." If the trustee doesn't agree, he or she must show why the designation isn't correct.